Paul holds up anti-lynching bill. See Harris and Booker's response.

An emotional debate arises over anti-death legislation as Cory Booker objects to Rand Paul’s amendment

With the commencement of the memorial service for George Floyd in Minnesota, Paul, who was suspending popular bipartisan legislation to make unlawful killing a federal crime, arrived in the Washington Senate to add an amendment to the Collective Murder Act and then pass it. He argued that the bill as overly broadly written and said its amendment “would apply criminal penalties to brutal executions only, not other crimes.” Then the Republican Senator asked unanimously to pass the bill with this amendment. However, both Harris and Booker spoke out against the effort and Booker objected.

“Senator Paul is now trying to weaken a bill that has already been passed – there is no reason for this, and there is no reason for it,” Harris said.

In emotional notes, Booker said he felt “very raw today”, saying “Of all the days we do this now when God passes, if the bill passes today, what that means for America. He finally agreed.”

Booker said: “It will talk about ethnic pain and wounding generations.” And he raised his voice, “I do not need my colleague, Senator from Kentucky, to tell me about one execution in this country. I stood at the museum in Montgomery, Alabama, and watched African American families crying about the stories of pregnant women who were executed in this country and their children were torn from them while this body did not He does something. ”

Referring to Paul, Booker said that he had not questioned Paul’s heart, but that he disagreed sharply with his actions.

Booker said: “My colleague there, Rand Paul, was the first to shook hands with him” in the Senate Chamber. “He’s my friend … but I’m very raw today.”

Paul said: “I am seeking to amend this legislation not because I consider execution lightly seriously, but because I take it seriously, and this legislation does not,” arguing that “this law will reduce the meaning of death by broadly defining it to include a simple bruise or Abrasion. Our country’s history of racist terrorism requires more seriousness from us. ”

Soon after, Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska came to Earth to deliver a speech she had been planning for weeks to give suffrage to women. It took a moment before her speech to talk about the controversy she had just seen and to say some of her words about the country’s situation.

“I just want you to know that I’m grateful that I was here on the ground to hear in person. We can read words, but when we have the ability to hear and feel those words, their true meaning comes out,” said Murkowski to Booker and Harris.

Murkowski said she wants to talk today because she feels very silent.

“Some people have objected to me. I have been disciplined by some … from some very close friends who say” You are silent, Lisa. Why did not you specify what we see? “I fought for the right words, as a white woman born and raised in Alaska with a privileged family, I cannot feel the openness and affection that my Korean friends and Kamala have just heard, and I have not lived their lives. I can listen, I can educate myself, and I can try to be a therapist When we need recovery. “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *